 
Texas Court Rules to Not Enforce Portions of
Mexican Vitro Plan of Reorganization
June 14, 2012
by Katie O'Mara, komara@glass.com
A Texas bankruptcy court ruled Wednesday that it will not enforce
Vitro's Mexican Plan of Reorganization in the United States. The
ruling comes days after the counsels for Vitro and the noteholders
presented their cases in front of the court.
"Having reviewed the evidence and considered the testimony
of witnesses over four days, this court believes that a portion
of the Concurso plan should not be enforced as presented,"
wrote the judge in his ruling. "Accordingly, this court concludes
that the Concurso plan approved in this instance, which extinguishes
the guarantee claims of the objecting creditors that were given
under an indenture issued in the United States against non-debtor
entities that are subsidiaries of Vitro, should not be accorded
comity to the extent it provides for the extinguishment of the non-debtor
guarantees of the indentures. Such order manifestly contravenes
the public policy of the United States and is also precluded from
enforcement under 1507, 1521 and 1522 of the Bankruptcy Code."
Vitro has expressed its intent to immediately file an appeal on
this matter.
"We will defend the enforcement of Vitro's restructuring at
the subsidiary level in the U.S.," says Claudio Del Valle,
chief restructuring office for Vitro.
The court did affirm Vitro 's claims that there had been no corruption
in the Mexican proceedings and that the judge was unable to confirm
that if the Concurso plan was enforced in the U.S. it would have
adverse effects on credit markets. In addition, the court also agreed
with Vitro 's contention that there was no evidence that the Concurso
proceeding was unfair to the noteholders.
"We are pleased to have won on all of the factual issues in
this ruling, and we are confident in the legal bases for our arguments
on appeal," says Andrew LeBlanc, counsel for Vitro.
The court stated that if the Concurso ruling was enforced it could
create a precedent for further cases.
"However, if approved for enforcement, the present order would
create precedent without any seeming bounds. The Concurso plan presently
before the court discharges the unsecured debt of non-debtor subsidiaries.
What is to prevent this type of plan from eventually giving non-consensual
releases to discharge the liabilities of officers, directors and
any other person?" reads the ruling.
The order says the court intends to stay the decision until June
29 and will allow Vitro time to appeal and to seek a stay on appeal.
|