Industry Debates Code Proposal to Lower
SHGC in Climate Zones 1-3
October 28, 2010
Energy efficiency is a major part of the International Code Council's
2010 Final Action Hearings, which are underway this week at the
Charlotte Convention Center in Charlotte, N.C. A number of proposals
relate directly to fenestration, and the outcome of the hearings
will result in the 2012 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC),
which will be published early next year.
Proposal EC25, for example, which was submitted by Bill Fay, representing
the Energy Efficient Coalition, would lower the solar heat gain
coefficient (SHGC) in climate zones 1, 2 and 3 from .30 to .25.
During this morning's hearings the committee action up for debate
was for disapproval, and several from the glass and fenestration
industry spoke out both for and against the motion.
Speaking on behalf of the Window and Door Manufacturers Association,
Jeff Inks said EC13 (the Department of Energy's residential energy
code proposal that covered many areas, including more stringent
envelope requirements), which was approved, already "gets us as
close to 30 percent [energy savings] as we can get reasonably at
this time. There's no need for what's proposed in EC25."
Inks added that the association was particularly concerned about
"Not only is it different for some vertical fenestration products,
but especially skylights. One of the things we don't see here is
consideration for daylighting," said Inks, who added that a lower
SHGC would lead to a reduction in visible light, in turn leading
to having more light switches turned on and, consequently, more
Thom Zaremba, who spoke on behalf of Pilkington and AGC, also urged
disapproval of EC25. He noted that the committee statement says
the proposal takes an aggressive approach to increasing the stringency
of the provisions well beyond EC13 and this would be too restrictive.
"This one goes way beyond reasonable. The committee got it right
[that this should be disapproved]," he said. "The 0.25 SHGC in the
South will block 50 to 60 percent of the visible light. If that
happens people will start turning lights on."
Tom Culp, speaking for the Glazing Industry Code Committee and
the Aluminum Extruders Council, was also opposed to EC25, saying
not only was it unnecessary, it contains flaws.
"Where are the skylights? Look at the prescriptive table. The skylight
column is gone and there's no replacement provision." Culp said
it also removes hurricane products, "which raises a real life safety
structural issue. You cannot ignore or treat structural issues separate
from energy … this promotes material that has a 30 to 35 percent
lower design pressure."
Speaking on behalf of the American Architectural Manufacturers
Association, Julie Ruth also urged disapproval. She addressed the
cost-effectiveness of going to .25 in climate zone 3 and climate
"These are parts of the country where buildings are traditionally
built with some openness to the outside because there are certain
times of the day where you want to take advantage of the outdoors
to condition the indoor space," Ruth said. "We have no information
that these changes would be cost-effective in these climate zones."
Others, including Chris Mathis of Mathis Consulting, spoke to approve
"Low solar heat gain glazing is available from every manufacturer
and it does not mean a reduction in visible light transmittance,"
said Mathis, adding, "this code change has no technological advances
in it … it uses technology we have today."
Mike Fisher with the Kellen Co. spoke on the issue of life safety.
"Please understand this proposal in no way changes any requirements
for windows or doors or other penetrations to meet requirements
for impact-resistance," he said. "There are products out there that
meet the structural code and meet this code."
After rounds of comments and rebuttal, the committee's motion to
The IECC code hearings continue in Charlotte, N.C., until October
31. Stay tuned to USGNN.com™ for more reports and updates.
Need more info and analysis about the issues?
CLICK HERE to subscribe to USGlass magazine.