 
General Contractor Objects to AAI's Motion
to Sell
September 10, 2012
by Penny Stacey, pstacey@glass.com
Skanska USA, a New York-based general contractor, has objected
to American Architectural Inc.'s (AAI) recent motion
to sell its assets, including several outstanding subcontracts,
via an auction process. The objection and motion both were filed
in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania,
where AAI's Chapter 11 bankruptcy case currently is under review.
Skanska had awarded a subcontract to American Architectural for
the interior glass works and interior glass railings at the PATH
Hall, a part of the World Trade Center Transportation Hub. This
subcontract is one of several listed in AAI's motion to sell as
part of its assets that would be up for sale at the requested auction.
While the two parties had resolved a prior dispute regarding the
subcontract via an agreement
filed with the court in July, Skanska officials write, "
nowhere in the stipulation did AAI reserve its right to assign
the subcontract to a third-party under Section 365(f)(1) of the
bankruptcy code. The concept of assignment was never contemplated
or embodied in the stipulation, most certainly, because the parties
recognized that assignment of the subcontract
is legally
impermissible and practically impossible."
Additionally, Skanska alleges that AAI "has continued to fail
to perform under the subcontract despite receiving payment for its
May and June 2012 requisitions."
"As of September 4, 2012, Skanska has received no drawings
and/or material in exchange for the aforementioned payments during
the post-Stipulation period," writes the company in its objection.
"Despite repeated requests, Skanska has not received a response
concerning the timeline for when AAI intends to deliver these drawings
and/or material, and Skanska, as well as the PATH Hall project,
remain at great risk."
The company further argues that because a deadline of September
14 had been set earlier in the case for AAI to assume or reject
the PATH Hall subcontract, "the subcontract should be removed
from this process and the procedural and scheduling order should
reflect that the subcontract is not to be included in the 'subcontracts'
to be sold or assigned."
In conclusion, Skanska writes, "While the debtors enter 'free
fall,' they should be held to prior court orders and the stipulation,
and not attempt to bring the PATH Hall project, Skanska, the Port
Authority and the citizens in the Metropolitan area and neighboring
communities down with them."
The court had not yet ruled on AAI's motion for authorization to
sell its assets at press time.
|